Former federal prosecutor Maurene Comey and the Trump administration haven’t talked about settling her civil lawsuit and don’t imagine alternate options to a trial “could be helpful right now,” the events instructed the decide in a letter on Monday.
Comey is suing over her firing, arguing she was “abruptly and wrongfully terminated” as a result of her father is former FBI director James Comey, or due to her perceived political affiliation and beliefs.
Within the letter, her attorneys and the U.S. Legal professional’s workplace for the Northern District of New York, which is dealing with the case for the Justice Division, affirmed the necessity for a convention with the decide, which is presently scheduled for Thursday.
Comey desires the decide to order the federal government to start producing proof. Authorities attorneys are anticipated to ask the decide for time to file a movement to dismiss the case.
The protection mentioned the right place for Comey to argue just isn’t in court docket, however earlier than the Advantage Techniques Safety Board. Comey’s attorneys mentioned her case presents “novel” points about govt energy {that a} decide should resolve.
Daughter of former FBI Director James Comey, Maurene Comey, leaves the Albert V. Bryan United States Courthouse on November 13, 2025 in Alexandria, Virginia. The court docket is listening to oral arguments difficult the appointment of U.S. Legal professional for the Japanese District Lindsey Halligan, who signed the indictments in opposition to James Comey and New York Legal professional Normal Letitia James, as illegitimate.
Alex Wong/Getty Pictures
“Whereas there are circumstances that debate a President’s authority beneath Article II to take away Principal Officers and Inferior Officers, we’re unaware of any choice that discusses (not to mention approves of) a President’s use of Article II authority to take away with out trigger a non-officer civil service worker similar to a line-level Assistant United States Legal professional, in direct violation of the CSRA and the Invoice of Rights,” Comey’s attorneys, Nicole Gueron, Ellen Blain, Deepa Vanamali and Margaret Donovan wrote.
The protection characterised Comey’s case as routine.
“A federal worker’s claims that removing from federal service was arbitrary and capricious or performed in a fashion that didn’t present the method to which they contend they have been due just isn’t a novel difficulty,” authorities attorneys mentioned.
The letter mentioned there aren’t any significant settlement talks, and various dispute decision mechanisms could be unhelpful in the intervening time.
